Home Page
About Us Page
Links Page
Contact Us Page
Forums Page
Users Pages
Guestbook Page
Search Site Page
Project Page
 
Home | Profile | Active Topics | Active Polls | Search | FAQ
Username:
 Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Main Area
 Australian Ham Chat Area
 E-QSL is it any better for returns!!

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List Spell Checker
   
Message:
* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

  Check here to include your profile signature.
 Check here to subscribe to this topic.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
vk3pa Posted - 16 Jan 2009 : 11:42:25 PM
With 145 e-DXCC worked on e-qsl,only 110 of those stations were certificated "so less than 80% counted for my e-qsl dxcc award....
On stations WORKED less than 40 % were certificated .
I do not download my log's to e-qs,so therefore only stations who sent me E-QSL's are counted in this draft..
My conclusion is E-QSL RETURNS are no better then rx from direct/buro returns...
I find best QSL returns are via direct!!97% returns..
With e-qsl certificate contacts been accepted by CQ Awards mgr we can only hope more "HAMS WILL GET CERTIFICATED" so bringing eqsl system into beening a usefull way of qsl'n.. "{but" remember u/ they have to be a BRONZE or better member of eqsl!)

Goldfields DX Amateur Radio Group © 2002 - 2022 Goldfields DX Amateur Radio Group Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.39 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000